Friday 13 March 2009

clarification

On the list it also states about a pair of love birds being re-homed, please correct me if I am wrong, but didn’t Dawnie withdraw her request of re-homing these two birds immediately after witnessing the Mylo and JJ debacle? Maybe the situation was rectified so it would be good if someone could clarify this

The lovebirds that were rehomed did NOT belong to dawnie- they were seperate rehomes altogether from some time ago(march 2008) so carons claim there was totally untrue and unsupported, they were rescued by adele from freecycle
from adele on their thread:- i had seen an ad yesterday and no its wasnt the usual sites(preloved ect)it was on my local freecylcle group,for those who dont know its a local group that recycle items,for free to save them going to the tip.washers , cookers,sofas ect..the poor birds were only rehomed on sat but the new owner didnt like them :rant: luckly he had loads of offers but picked me to rehome them
dawnie did withdraw her request of rehoming once UKPR's name was brought into disrepute from caron & co, emails were sent to members asking them to come to carons blog(including one staff member) from john doe(why use a false identity?
emails rewceived from john doe sent to members past and present:-
Always wanted to say something but too scared to ask or be banned, well now here is your chance.

www.ukprwatch.blogspot.com

Apologies in advance to anyone that did not wish to receive this email, you will not be contacted again.

Kindest regards

John
on behalf of a birds welfare

From my point of view a rather dishonest and devious way of doing things to retreive peoples personal emails and then mass email like this(spamming)
in reply to the birds that pauline has from UKPR i know at least of the budgie who sadly died after he was rehomed with pauline , so it is possible that she does only have 2 UKPR birds with her now that im sure are well looked after and cared for, the list was of all birds who have been SUCCESSFULLY REHOMED not birds who currently reside in their new homes now.

in reply to the homecheck of the birds who were 'seized' from a UKPR mod, there was absolutely no cause for concern to begin with , birds were happy and well cared for , there were visits from staff who saw no prolems-the problems only arose when the ACO started working a very busy job and time was more consumed, after several attemtpts to contact no replies came back or replies saying they would call and didnt, it was only then when a bird was to be rehomed that was at her premises and contact couldnt be made that vikky turned up to get the bird who somebody was looking forward to welcoming them into their home that they saw how bad things had really got and decided all birds needed to be returned to UKPR, i will also add there was many offers of helping not only UKPR birds but also her own if she was finding it difficult on a temporary basis from others on UKPR- does that sound like malice??

donations go towards helping the next birds in need, some have no cages, or cages that are not adequate for them to live in without causing them mental health issues - so the money has to come from somewhere in these cases , some cages are donated but depending on the particuilar birds needs they may not be good enough, vets bills are not cheap and i dont mean taking it to the rspca or pdsa and giving a £10 donation towards your pets healthcare , they are taken to qualified avian vets if needed, travel and fuel is another huge amount that is covered with donations , we cover the UK from scotland to cornwall, and sometimes an ACO does collect and pay from their own pocket but what happens when u do a 600 mile trip to sort not 1 but a few birds (ie- drop one off , pick one up and deliver to suitable emergency carer/s), would you be able to say no sorry cant do it as i cant afford the fuel??? no you try your hardest to help especially when their story is so heartbreaking, the donations are greatly appreciated as they cover this side of UKPR work.

this is not detailed clarification but i hope it will help see our point of view.

2 comments:

  1. Seems the bods from ukpr watch can do a better job?perhaps they will try,cant wait to see how long it lasts.No one involved in ukpr believes carons propaganda for one minute its only the ex ukpr members who seem to have a problem.Wonder why,sour grapes comes to mind.Why havn't people come forward who are active in ukpr with complaints? according to caro its because they are scared of having there birds siezed by ukpr heavies ,laughable ukpr has removed birds from only 1 house and the reasoning has been accepted for needing to do this.UKPRWatch is finished its over,they keep repeating the same old rubbish starting to sound like a broken record.Im more suprised at jebirds that anyone else,posting lies about a galah being stolen and hidden by ukpr when no galah has ever been through the rescue,no facts again from ukpr watch to back it up.

    They make claim after claim after claim but as of yet have shown no evidence to support there claims,which i hope they do actually have because a court will want to see the evidence to visious lies from a bunch of banned ex members.

    I suggest everyone dont even both looking at there blog,the answers to there comments are all hand picked and need approval before being added,why is that? i tell you why they dont want to know the truth and they dont like to have to give it,they give no fact just hearsay from disgruntled ex ukpr members.

    ReplyDelete
  2. well i dont think it will make a big difference any ways they wont post anything that is saying how unfair they are being im not a member of ukpr but i hope you take her all the way to court and it cost her loads that will teach her for trying to get a free bird
    dave

    ReplyDelete

your comment has been submitted, thankyou